[ajug-members] Clojure-Conj and the State of Java

[Kerry Wilson]

The language is lacking some features for sure.  For instance, I would love
to see closures, stronger type inferencing (similar to scala), and traits
or mixins.  If I had those features, I would be much happier with the
language.

What Java (the language) does have going for it is readability.  Have you
ever been involved with a large project written in Ruby or another dynamic
language?  It can be quite daunting.  I realize that Java is not the only
static language on the JVM, but the options are limited and none of them
have much traction.

Are you using all the latest tools and frameworks?  I feel like a lot of
the problems you are railing against have been solved in JEE 6, Maven, and
Spring or some of the other newer frameworks.

kw



On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 9:06 AM, <acidbriggs at gmail.com> wrote:

> Did anyone go to Clojure-Conj last week?  I did.  Any thoughts?  I think I
> am falling in love.
>
> In general, I have come to loathe Java, the language. Its endless ceremony
> (if anyone has really implemented good design patterns or have written a
> large swing application you know what I mean), code generators, XML
> configurations, cross-cutting concerns, dependency hell, time consuming
> rebuilds and redeploys, mutability by default semantics and lack of
> features: first class functions, type inference, regular expression
> literals, multiline string support (it goes on) that just about every
> freakin' language has now. I am not very excited about Oracle being the
> keeper of the code either. It won't be long until your JVM sucks unless you
> pay for the 'premium' one.
>
> Now, you may think I am just ranting, but I am really curious to know what
> your perceived state of Java as a tool in general is.
>
> Do people only learn Java so they can get paid? I mean, why would anyone
> want to start off with it? Or, why would anyone want to continue using it
> with all the other choices there are. I know the JVM can be a big selling
> point (and I believe that is the real technology, not the language) but you
> can run many languages on it. So, why are you (if you are) avoiding Ruby,
> Scala, Python, Clojure (screw Groovy, IMHO). If it really is all about
> getting work done and time-to-deliver, hasn't anyone realized how much
> extra time and effort go into developing good Java applications? I see that
> a majority of people employed as Java developers are just doing the
> enterprise, web application, transaction script (Fowler) applications which
> have more XML and boilerplate (ceremony) code in them than actual business
> rules just keep on chugging along with Java. We rely on code generators,
> Aspect-J, annotations and a bunch of other things just to do the simplest
> task of getting data to a screen. A
>  web application I had written in Java back in 2001 would most likely be
> 10x the size and require 10x the RAM due to all the dependencies needed
> now, for what purpose? We now have tens of classes being written,
> generated, injected and intercepted to do the same thing we've always done
> in less code and time. Does anyone remember when stack traces weren't so
> ridiculously long?
>
> Isn't anyone else frustrated? Or have we, as developers who use Java, not
> been paying attention to what the rest of the world (that world outside
> your enterprise) is doing?
>
> I'd like to hear about people who are using the JVM with other languages.
> How many of you are polyglots in your profession?
>
> --briggs
> _______________________________________________
> ajug-members mailing list
> ajug-members at ajug.org
> http://www.ajug.org/mailman/listinfo/ajug-members
>



-- 
http://www.allthingswilson.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ajug.org/pipermail/ajug-members/attachments/20111118/ccb7d98f/attachment-0001.html