[ajug-members] Opinions on a project re-write - To EJB3 or Not
Rick
rickcr at gmail.com
Sun May 25 21:23:01 EDT 2008
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Thomas, Dave <dthomas at tandbergtv.com> wrote:
> The difference there (in my limited experience) is that Spring is more feature rich and powerful, the EJB spec is simpler albeit less well-documented.
Is there something I'll particularly miss going with EJB3 instead of
Spring? From what I can gather EJB3 does happen to be more simple than
using Spring (which is sort of ironic since pre-EJB3 of course it was
the other way around.) Several people have mentioned how Spring is so
'feature rich' but, at least at the moment, I can't think of anything
that I'll be missing using the standard EJB3 stack instead of Spring?
--
Rick
More information about the ajug-members
mailing list