[ajug-members] aspectj

[Les Hazlewood]

You might enjoy YourKit too: http://www.yourkit.com/

I think its one of the better ones.

(I have no affiliation to any profiling software company ;) ).

Cheers,

Les

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 4:16 PM, mike stittleburg
<mstittleburg at bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> yep, i've used jprofiler quite a bit when i used to do performance work. It
> works pretty well but it's to
> heavyweight for load testing. I tried JIP jiprof.sourceforge.net but it
> still puts to much of a drag on system. Netbeans has
> a profiler too (and it's free) and i might take a look at that.
>
> thanks,
> mike
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Wagener [mailto:peter at wagener.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 3:40 PM
> To: ajug-members at ajug.org
> Subject: Re: [ajug-members] aspectj
>
>
> I've used JProfiler quite a bit to profile an app within JBoss, and
> had good experiences with it.
>
> The thing that worries me about a roll-your-own profiler via AOP is
> that you may end up seeing some of the data (i.e method timing), but
> you may not have any visibility into other things that could be
> harming your app's performance (i.e memory leaks, unexpected code
> paths, etc).  Profiling is really hard to do well, and for my money
> using someone else's experience (i.e the JProfiler folks) is well
> worth it.
>
>
> Just my $0.02 --
>
> Peter
>
>
> On May 19, 2008, at 10:25 AM, Alex Zhang wrote:
>
>> Interestingly, I thought about the exact same thing last week, using
>> aop to profile my JEE apps deployed in JBoss.
>>
>> The JBoss Profiler project seems not getting lots of attention
>> (probably because there is not even an actually release? another
>> chicken and egg thing). I will give JProfiler a shot if it doesn't
>> work I will jump into AOP.
>>
>> One challenge of using AOP to do profiling is the post processing, how
>> to capture the stack trace (call hierarchy) and generate a nice
>> drill-down report.
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 9:31 AM, mike stittleburg
>> <mstittleburg at bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> It seemed like the only good examples of AOP were either logging or
>>> transactions. I'm interested in using it for performance monitoring
>>> (capture
>>> method times).
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: James Holmes [mailto:james at jamesholmes.com]
>>> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 8:37 AM
>>> To: ajug-members at ajug.org
>>> Subject: Re: [ajug-members] aspectj
>>>
>>> We've been using AOP via Spring on some of the projects I've been
>>> working
>>> on. Nothing very exciting though, just some logging. AOP and JMX
>>> were both
>>> "hot" technologies a few years ago that got alot of attention, but
>>> I think
>>> the reason you don't hear much about them now is because they're
>>> mostly
>>> infrastructure technologies. They get used up front in a project
>>> and then
>>> are touched very little after that.
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 10:14 PM, mike stittleburg
>>> <mstittleburg at bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Anyone out there using AspectJ? Seemed like AOP was a big thing a
>>>> couple
>>>> years ago but doesn't seem to be active lately.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ajug-members mailing list
>>>> ajug-members at ajug.org
>>>> http://www.ajug.org/mailman/listinfo/ajug-members
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ajug-members mailing list
>>> ajug-members at ajug.org
>>> http://www.ajug.org/mailman/listinfo/ajug-members
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ajug-members mailing list
>> ajug-members at ajug.org
>> http://www.ajug.org/mailman/listinfo/ajug-members
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ajug-members mailing list
> ajug-members at ajug.org
> http://www.ajug.org/mailman/listinfo/ajug-members
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ajug-members mailing list
> ajug-members at ajug.org
> http://www.ajug.org/mailman/listinfo/ajug-members
>