[ajug-members] threads

[mcdaniel]

i understand, this was not a question- like, from a test- it's simply me 
wondering...  -i understand why it looks that way though...

b

Chris Fowler wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 21:38 -0400, mcdaniel wrote:
>   
>> can anyone please answer my question?
>>     
>
> Not good following a mailing list post asking for an answer to the
> question.  You'll not get many answers that way.
>
> I did a quick google and found some answers
>
> http://saloon.javaranch.com/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=27&t=002061
>
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Extend+Threads+vs
> +Runnable&btnG=Google+Search
>
>
>   
>> barclay
>>
>>  >>>>
>>
>> 5/1/2008; barclay wrote:
>>     
>>> why would one ever "extend Thread" vs. "implementing Runnable"? -are 
>>> there speed gains/losses?
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ajug-members mailing list
>>> ajug-members at ajug.org
>>> http://www.ajug.org/mailman/listinfo/ajug-members
>>>   
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> ajug-members mailing list
>> ajug-members at ajug.org
>> http://www.ajug.org/mailman/listinfo/ajug-members
>>     
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ajug-members mailing list
> ajug-members at ajug.org
> http://www.ajug.org/mailman/listinfo/ajug-members
>
>
>