[ajug-members] ii- correct interface programming

[521]

(how cool is this language  :)  i can't wait for my sun-275-course comming up...

ah, and so with empty method bodies in an interface, and the contract being in place for calling classes, -the guarantee is there that the verb/method/function will be run how-ever the "implementation" needs it to be...

is this correct:>> a class that implements an interface is the class that "is" the "calling" class. or am i saying that incorrectly?  or simply put:  what is a "calling class"? the one that is calling the -methods- from an "extended class" -or an- "implemented interface"?

barclay

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.ajug.org/pipermail/ajug-members/attachments/20080725/30641ebc/attachment.html