[ajug-members] Which Source Version Control System do you prefer?

[Barry Hawkins]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bill Siggelkow wrote:
> Subversion -- it is the most natural evolution from CVS and it fixes 
> the CVS headaches of unversioned directories. There are other  benefits
> such as ability to perform disconnected operations,  authentication and
> authorization via Apache 2.0 server, WebDAV  support, cross-platform,
> open source, free, etc.
> 
> Can't say enough good things about it so far ....
> 
> -Bill Siggelkow
[...]
+1 on Subversion, for all the stuff Bill mentions plus atomic commits.
Few things suck more than a partial and corrupt CVS commit.

- --
Barry Hawkins
All Things Computed
site: www.alltc.com
weblog: www.yepthatsme.com

Registered Linux User #368650
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDjz6uHuKcDICy0QoRAnEfAJ0cLDFK9QSN4JPhumarleNBGPLPDACggLz4
Loeg2z4T9GK/rrUnd+WBv9Y=
=xiTz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----