[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ajug-members]: So what _did_ happen to Smalltalk?
- To: ajug-members@ajug.org
- Subject: Re: [ajug-members]: So what _did_ happen to Smalltalk?
- From: Paul Philion <philion@acmerocket.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 22:16:41 -0400
- In-Reply-To: <40B4C5C8.2000706@cobol-conversions.com>
- References: <19498A88-AF2C-11D8-A33C-000A95B341CA@allthingscomputed.com> <40B4C5C8.2000706@cobol-conversions.com>
- User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502)
Actually, NeXT used Objective-C. The entire operating system was written
in it, as was the original WebObjects (based on NeXTStep, ported to
other platforms).
The world would be a different place today if Objective-C had been
generally adopted instead of C++. I always thought that Objective-C was
much more elegant than C++, and AOP is built-in (using categories and
the way "messages" are handled).
Objective-C was much like a "Smalltalk with C syntax", but in many ways
different from Java (reference counting instead of garbage collection, etc.)
- Paul Philion
drbcpg wrote:
> Smalltalk came out out 15 years or more ago. I believe it was developed
> at Xerox PARC maybe 20 years ago. I originally ran it on a PC. Job's
> NEXT computer only used Smalltalk. I still have my Smalltalk manuals and
> floppy disks to run on a PC. If I remember correctly, a Java programmer
> should not have any major problems with Smalltalk.
>
> I am traveling this week. When I return back to Atlanta I can look up
> more detailed information in my computer books library. I think I have
> manuals on almost every language, that had some serious following, for
> the last for the last 50 years.
>
> David Black