[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Non persistent connection
Perhaps the consultant was trying to push your towards using web
services.
--- "Shengaout, Misha (MARC)" <MShengaout@MARCLife.com> wrote:
> If you decided to go EJB route, RMI-IIOP is THE way to go, so any
> talk about
> "lightweight" connection with J2EE is a nonsense. But I would really
> like to
> know why is it that you are using J2EE server for Swing client? Do
> you have
> a web client to support as well? Are you having a very complex
> transactions
> spanning multiple databases? Because if the answers are no and you
> are using
> J2EE just as an object-to-relational layer, the whole EJB approach is
> "heavyweight". In such case the lightweight approach would be using
> some
> sort of the object-to-relational data layer, like open source
> Objectstyle
> Cayenne or Castor, or a similar commercial product.
>
> Misha
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mingfei shi [mailto:mingfeis@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:21 AM
> To: ajug-members@www.ajug.org
> Subject: Non persistent connection
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> We are currently prototyping a J2ee project by using RMI-IIOP to
> connect the
>
> rich client (Swing) to j2ee server. But our higher level management
> had an
> outsider consultant review the prototyping architecture, saying
> RMI-IIOP
> connection is too heavyweight and it should be replaced with
> lightweight and
>
> non-persistent couterpart (unfortunately he didn't elaborate more
> than
> that). My understanding is non-persistent connection is only used
> between
> browser and web-server. Is anyone familiar with this "lightweight
> and
> non-persistent connection" between Java Swing client and ejb server?
> Any
> info would be deeply appreciated.
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Mingfei
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
> http://www.hotmail.com
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com